Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | elar_verole's commentslogin

I just thought it was interesting to remind everyone how mind boggling chatGPT first public version was to everyone, as it was released 3.5 years ago.

Nothing came close before it, and now we have agents / models that are not even comparable in terms of capabilities and "intelligence".

We'll see where it goes from here !


Sometimes feel like I'm the only one still using it around me, but the service is still great and functional

Ya I still have mad love for TPB. My ISP was blocking my private tracker recently and while I would usually just run things through a seedbox it made me happy I could still turn to my trusty ol' friend.

Started some playtests for our game with my brother (I mean we don't REALLY have testers yet, we need a bit more work first because right now it's lacking 1 or 2 core elements of the fun / gameplay loop): https://srdnvntrz.itch.io/runz

also created and got our steam page validated: https://store.steampowered.com/app/4704420/runz/

We've been moving fast, it's our second project and we hope to deliver something people find fun and appealing, at least for our friends !

We suck at marketing though (such is the game dev burden), but we're having fun and learning stuff, which is what it's all about I guess.


Yes, I love how everyone uses this argument, when what they were saying was among the lines of "GPT-2 would make it too easy to generate spam, deepfakes, content to manipulate opinion..." (not the actual quote but something like that). Turns out it was completely correct if you look at the state of the internet right now.

Obviously, they still overhype and oversell this end of humanity stuff, but this argument regurgitated ad-nauseam is not THAT great of an example when you think about it.


People need heroes. It's like the Keanu Reeves or Musk era, all the ""badass"" stories about this or that soldier / local hero / w/e that are very often overblown and get further and further away from the initial facts every time they resurface. No hate here, just noticing there is a weird visceral need to distill stories to their most essential, good vs evil, and the Tesla v Edison thing embodies this perfectly I think.


Keanu Reeves and Nikola Tesla to a degree as well, are decent figures.

Aside from all the cult classics Keanu is part of like john wick and the matrix, even discounting that, he is a good person in it of itself who is genuinely humble and might be one of the best persons within hollywood.

What I feel pissed about is that people like Andrew Tate and others like them took the concept of Matrix and the contributions Keanu did within that movie and tried to capitalize on that cult classic decades after in the most toxic form that might be the issue if we are talking about an era

To be honest, Nikola tesla is also a great person within the context of his time. GGP's comment is still true but Tesla's contributions can hardly be reinstated and I'd much rather people believe these to be the heros (Keanu/Tesla) rather than Tate/Musk etc.

If I take anything from Keanu, I would like to take his humility/humbleness.


Tate is just attention hungry. It’s pretty obvious. If you feed no attention to him, he will go back to where he crawled from.


Whilst I agree that Keanu is a most excellent human, he was hardly responsible for the concept of the Matrix. In my opinion, Philip K Dick was a major influence (I'm a fan and consider him the prophet of the modern age), though Gibson's Neuromancer was likely a big influence too. (Also, there's the old Doctor Who episode "The Deadly Assassin" which features the Matrix).

It always seems to me that the far right are bereft of original ideas and always co-opt other pre-existing concepts. There's exceptions, but I always find that right wing works are always lacking humour or irony (c.f. Ayn Rand's works).


> the far right are bereft of original ideas and always co-opt other pre-existing concepts.

That's not unique to them: Good artists copy; great artists steal.


Yes, but I'd have difficulty in pronouncing Andrew Tate as a good or great artist. Maybe con-artist would be the highest that I'd go.


"It is only the unimaginative who ever invents. The true artist is known by the use he makes of what he annexes. And he annexes everything."

- Oscar Wilde


Except for Keith Moon. All the stories about him are true and if anything underplay the truth. :-)


I just don't understand where these people get all this money. The answer is often "oh it's just claude max" like man I don't have 200$ MONTHLY lying around ?? That's half my rent


Some of the Claude whales I know:

- Highly paid FAANG engineers that are working on side projects / startup ideas, and will pay whatever it takes. They have the means to do so.

- Startups with funds.

- Regular tech workers that are allowed to use the company card.


Makes sense


Where are you living that your rent is $400?


Living in Paris, but I exaggerated rent is actually 600€ and it's like the best opportunity one can have. Still, even if I lived in a regular flat with 1000 euros rent, I don't see how 20% additional "rent" money is worth it for side fun projects


Yeah, completely agree. Having to pay for these things is the number one thing stopping me from using them.


You can start with the $20 plan or use the Chinese models which are cheap.


Some could be in very expensive areas where their rent could be 10x your rent


It's just the equivalent of that one student restating what the teacher just said with no added value


Hey - imo this is a pretty good idea, but the login you are using is basically spoofing that your app is Gemini CLI to google. As we saw (yesterday I think ?), this can get people's Google accounts banned, so I wouldn't use this / would recommend people against it.


Oh, it is actually using the same approach like openclaw. I did't not know about Gemini OAuth limitations. Afaik OpenAI Codex is ok with that.


Yes this is just for google - probably should add a disclaimer that it might not be allowed for google users. I still think it's a neat idea


Sorry to sound rude - but you polluted the context, pointing to the fact you would like A, and then found it annoying it tried to do A ?


Oh, please. There’s always a way to blame the user, it’s a catch-22. The fact is that coding agents aren’t perfect and it’s quite common for them to fail. Refer to the recent C-compiler nonsense Anthropic tried to pull for proof.


It fails far less often than I do at the cookie cutter parts of my job, and it’s much faster and cheaper than I am.

Being honest; I probably have to write some properly clever code or do some actual design as a dev lead like… 2% of my time? At most? The rest of the code related work I do, it’s outperforming me.

Now, maybe you’re somehow different to me, but I find it hard to believe that the majority of devs out there are balancing binary trees and coming up with shithot unique algorithms all day rather than mangling some formatting and dealing with improving db performance, picking the right pattern for some backend and so on style tasks day to day.


I know I am not supposed to be negative in HN, but lay off the koolaid, dear colleague.


I think you are underappreciating how "manipulation of poly market odds" can be destructive when you are betting on geopolitics. Here this means that every decision is now a conflict of interest, and that doing the unpredictable (politically, economically etc) has a financial incentive for potential insiders. Sounds pretty dangerous to me.


On the other hand we have had stock markets forever. Sure you couldn't directly bet on e.g. if trump would invade iran, but you could indirectly bet on it by betting on things like the price of oil.

I dont think this is a new threat.


It's all fun and games until someone decides to bet $100K that someone they don't like won't die via assassination this year.


It was the crash of the stock markets that eventually created the social situation that pushed people into WW.


Comparing crusty old stock markets to the mass appeal of shiny, low-barrier-to-entry Polymarket is somewhat naive.


Polymarket is way higher barrier to entry than the stock market. For starters you need to sent ETH over the Polygon network. Stock market is in dollars.


I don't think Polymarket even allows US people yet, but Kalshi you can fund with a credit card even.


How is that any different from existing financial markets?


Heavy regulation, harder to anonymize, and overall less person exposed to insider info because you can bet on only a subset of stuff, and not everything that can ever happen. Mind you, I still think these existing financial markets do have a ton of issues of this kind (trump's tariff to manipulate the market is a very recent example), but why add more on top of it ?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: