Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fortran77's commentslogin

Yes. It’s a Mac problem. That’s why Macs do the worst at pwn2own. It’s compounded by the fact that Mac users deny that there are problems in their beloved OS.

cat is a file concatenation utility. UNIX people know to view text files with more.


"Last Witness to President Abraham Lincoln Assassination on 'I've Got A Secret' Television Show"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RPoymt3Jx4


I've had conversations with people born in the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries!


> When you include all three levels, it comes to $32K/person/year

Which is why these calculators should tell people who pay less than $32K that they are getting supported by the 5% who pay most of the taxes...


we should also break it down by state and determine distribution of electoral college votes based on it

> they are getting supported by the 5% who pay most of the taxes

The same 5% who in many cases run massively profitable companies that pay their workers on the bottom so much less than a living wage that they are forced into tax-funded social safety net programs like SNAP to survive.

That 5% can cry me a river about their tax burden.


WSJ Gift Link: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/for-its-next-act-allbirds-makes-...

I think this may be the Pets.com sockpuppet moment, but for AI


8 years ago:

Long Island Iced Tea Soars 500% After Changing Its Name to Long Blockchain

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15979024

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-21/crypto-cr...


And also liability for things falling out of windows.

Is that not also a concern for window AC units?

Yes. Which is why laws require brackets, etc. But landlords have to allow window air conditioners (installed properly, etc) because old people can die in the heat. They're less likely to want to accept liability for something not required by law. Air Conditioners also injure firefighters because they tend to fall during fires:

https://nypost.com/2026/01/06/us-news/nyc-bravest-hit-in-hea...


Grocery stores _absolutely_ supported the bag bans, though they weren't the initial groups asking for them. Similar to how the cigarette companies liked the TV ad bans--if nobody could advertise on TV than the playing field would be level and their profits all went up from decreased costs.

Some of them supported them because they were pressured into it. Grocery bans of bags and payment etc. are a PITA for customers. No business in it's right mind would force that on their customer unless they were required to. Passing the cost on to their customer is not an issue. Supporting laws requiring payment etc. are cost benefit analysis. Is it worth fighting the bad PR etc or go along. But obviously they wouldn't have provided the bags in the first place if it was not a competitive benefit to them.


It also doesn't seem fair to compete against stores that have to pay rent and taxes.

A gov run grocery store will have to pay rent and taxes.

The only difference is it doesn’t have to make profits to pay its owners.

The question is, why are you prioritizing being “fair” to people profiting off hunger, over being fair to working people trying to eat? Even if it is “unfair” this is a kind of unfair we should all support (assuming it succeeds at feeding people).


The working people who own grocery stores and bodegas are trying to eat.

Afaik bodegas make most of their money from cigarettes and booze, so this is unlikely to cut into their income in any real way. As for grocery stores owned and operated by the people who work in them, there aren’t many of those but I would expect they’ll be aware of that and open these gov stores far away from small local grocers (who tend to have cheap food already).

As for people who own grocery stores and don’t work in them? That’s an investment not a job, gov has no duty to protect individual investments over people’s basic needs.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: