> What H&M had, Zara somewhat still has, but Uniqlo doesnt have is the must buy or might not see it again.
And this is why I shop at Uniqlo, not at H&M or Zara. I like to ensure that my favourite basics will always be available for repurchase 2+ years after the original purchase, so I can replace a worn item.
Yeah, seriously, this is a solved problem in inventory management and we have the technology to spin up some infrastructure for that without too much effort nowadays, even for multinational brands. QR codes, a database, a REST API, and a static site generator. Literally that's it. You don't even need to store the webpages you generate, just generate them on-the-fly and discard them for rarer items.
I was looking for some specific bike parts and found the exact serial numbers for exactly what I need and there's no way to determine if anything similar still exists.
That being said, I wish semantic web blew up like it was supposed to. If we had ontologies for describing products that could be searched to find an appropriate item, that would be huge. But the scale was always limited by the nonzero rate of human error and the high rate at which humans lose interest in maintaining systems manually.
And this is why I shop at Uniqlo, not at H&M or Zara. I like to ensure that my favourite basics will always be available for repurchase 2+ years after the original purchase, so I can replace a worn item.