I wish they'd just get rid of dealerships already.
For most households buying a vehicle is their second largest purchase. It is meant to be enjoyable/fun. But dealerships have managed to make it very unfun/stressful/bad.
And there's always "but what if you find the unicorn dealership?!" but frankly those are few and far between. If you talk to random people in the street 9/10 will have a negative dealership story.
Dealerships do nothing to control price increases, and suggesting they do misunderstands the market forces. What controls prices is competition (i.e. other vehicles, from other manufacturers). All dealerships do is rent-seek in the middle.
I'd like to know that if my next door neighbor and I buy the same vehicle, that we paid the same price, and had the same experience. Just open up "show rooms" that don't sell vehicles, then a website where you can order for home delivery for a fixed price.
The whole "local jobs" argument would have more merit if dealerships weren't a toxic influence on local politics, and nobody is suggesting that manufacturers won't need to continue to offer local repair facilities for recalls and of course to staff these showrooms.
It was my first time buying a car by myself, the one that was totalled was a "hand me down" I purchased from a relative.
Dealerships were a nightmare. New cars sucked and were ludicrously expensive. I found out some older cars were good for reasonable prices, and went looked for one.
One dealership had a google review about how they allowed a car for servicing get stolen and didn't notice until police shown up to return the car. That same dealership tried to sell me a car that was obviously repainted in a shoddy manner and had literally misaligned parts while claiming the car never was crashed. And later a private seller complained to me unprompted that the same dealership despite being the official leadership or his vehicle, put the wrong oil in it.
Another dealership had very pushy people that didn't listen and kept attempting to sell me weak cars (0.8 liter 3 cylinder) when I kept explaining my house was on a giant hill and I had more powerful cars stall on it before.
Another one said some parts for the potential car were imported and expensive and I wouldn't want them when I asked the price... instead of just telling me the price. (I ended wanting the parts anyway, from another store obviously)
Unfortunately the reality is that dealer owners have a huge amount of local political power as they’re usually among the wealthiest people in their area. The us is generally decent when it comes to corruption, but this is one area where we have clearly failed.
They will go extinct eventually from rivals without a dealership network consuming passenger vehicle sales TAM along with service revenue decline as combustion miles traveled decreases (EVs require much less service, and heavy drivers are financially incentivized to transition to EVs).
What that tipping/inflection point is, I haven’t done the math. Smaller dealerships or those at the margins of course will be the first to close or sell out to mega corp dealer chains.
Carmax is pretty decent for new car sales where they’re able to offer that, in my experience, and their used car buying experience is very good as well (have bought a handful of used cars from Carmax). Cannot speak to Carvana, haven’t used them.
I dont think that dealerships are going extinct anytime soon. They have a lot of clout and political power.
Tesla moved their factory & headquarters to Texas but still cannot sell Teslas in TX without a dealer due to their franchised dealership laws.
Carmax is a good service but it does not sell new cars, only used cars.
> The us is generally decent when it comes to corruption
Honestly I think this is sadly untrue. The corruption is there, just hidden very very well and legalized in the form of political lobbying and wall st. hedge funds.
Dealers are a legally protected market in many states, which ban manufacturer-direct sales of cars. This is why in many states (including Texas), Tesla only has showrooms, not dealerships. (You need to fill out a purchase online and can't pick up any inventory from the, ahem, showroom.) No reason why Ford couldn't do the same, except that many dealerships which were independent are now owned by a few conglomerates who have a keen interest in preventing the loss of their business.
> I wish they'd just get rid of dealerships already. @Someone1234
Dealerships are a direct result of our Federal Government stepping in to protect consumers.
Vehicle manufacturers, before dealerships, would setup a lot to sell vehicles and then disappear several months later leaving citizens on the hook to attempt to resolve damages, repairs, or warranty issues.
The US Federal Government had enough complaints from citizens across the country to propose dealerships as a resolution. These car lots would become responsible for repair and warranty issues directly acting in the place of manufacturers.
In order to remove dealerships, one must first propose a valid remedy for these issues that dealerships are currently liable for.
It sucks going down to a lot to test drive a new car and being hassled by someone who often knows less about the vehicle than you, then your phone blowing up for weeks after.
I'd prefer to go to a showroom, test drive, not be hassled because there's no commission on the line. Then go do that at several other manufacture's showrooms, then go home and make my final selection in peace with a web browser and my spouse.
If this system becomes efficient there's no reason why the manufacturer cannot have an interstate warehouse Amazon style with some "next day delivery" vehicles. So you can either pick your bespoke configuration and wait [period] or get something in inventory for almost immediate delivery, but in both cases you're ordering via your browser/phone.
Now instead of shopping each state dealership's inventory one by one, you're shopping all collective dealership's inventory together and getting an incredible buying experience.
No, I want a car that can be serviced myself, in my own garage. For those rare jobs that are bigger than I can handle myself, I want to be able to choose from any trusted local mechanic, without them having to buy a specific manufacturer's proprietary tools. Open standards, from parts to tools.
I do not expect to get any of that with a new car, or even one made in the last couple of decades. That is why I will continue to maintain vehicles that were made before the turn of the century.
Dealerships are not an efficient way to run repair shops either. Would be better if manufacturers just used repair certification for independent shops.
Oh they are very efficient. Efficient at robbing people blind. I was going some work on a new gf car and asked when she last changed her spark plugs and she told me a couple years back at a hefty cost from the Honda dealership. I think it was close to $200. I can change them for the cost of the plugs so like $40. It is the easiest engine as well all plugs top and centre nothing buried way down the back of the engine like my parents s10 I want to change plugs on. It’s like a 15 minute job and requires no special tools.
Carvana "guaranteed" offers are not guaranteed. Dealers don't respect them. It's essentially clickbait that dealers put out to get leads.
Carvana is a search engine and nothing more. The offer numbers are entirely fictional. I was unable to get dealers to honor them even under threat of legal action for false advertising.
The only companies trying to work around dealers are Carmax and Tesla.
In the UK, there is Cazoo (which is a direct clone of Carvana).
My experience with them was incredible - I picked out the car and paid for it online and they brought it on a truck at exactly the agreed time. The whole purchase took 20 minutes of my time, including delivery. When they delivery person started to explain the car's features, I said I was familiar with the model as I had rented it before and researched it. He said great, he'll leave me to it. The price charged was exact, to the cent. The car's condition was exactly as shown online.
Hopefully those types of start-ups will be successful and will become more popular. It was exactly what I wish all car buying was like.
My past experiences buying cars in the US from dealerships was always a nightmare. Even if you walk in with cash to buy a specific car, it was always somehow a 4+ hour process with all the hoops they make you jump through and all the add-ons they try to tack on.
Now imagine if Carzoo also did the rentals so you could try out various cars over a span of days or weeks (paying a decent rate), then choose the one that fit best into your lifestyle over several weeks.
That would be a complete game changer. I would pay a premium for that.
When I bought my car (ford focus st), I had a company discount in my back pocket. so we went through the whole negotiation phase with the dealer and I got it down to a price I could swallow and right before I signed I pulled out my company discount slip and the salesman who was working with me was super upset, but honored the discount on top of our negotiated rate. 1. fuck dealerships and 2. dont use your morals with salesmen.
For the majority of very small towns in America, the richest family is probably the one that owns car dealership(s). They have a geographic monopoly so they haven't had to compete in the rollup of retail, banking, etc.
What? If you live in the very small towns of America you drive 30 minutes to 2 hours away to the dealerships in bigger towns which are usually owned by people far away.
Ford dealer wouldn't let me test drive a Fiesta ST. A fiesta... When the Focus RS dropped the dealers tacked on so much bullshit ADM it sank that car. Every new cool mustang? Forget about it. The Bronco? Get the lube out. Raptor? lol you better know the dealer's owner to get close to MSRP. It's a joke out there. Even my Honda Accord I bought last year, I had to call around and see which dealers weren't doing markups, on Accords... The one dealer had a 20k ADM on the two Civic Type Rs they had in the show room. Dealers used to be annoying, now they are straight up highway robbery.
Ironically, the FoRS sat on lots for ages after the first batch left show rooms. You could find them new well into 2019 (a model year after production stopped, or about 1.5 calendar years).
The current car market is making me regret no picking up another cool car in the late 10s. So many great options were on the market for well under MSRP: GT350s, base C7s, 1LE camaros, pre-refresh ND Miatas. Those same cars are probably selling for well over purchase price now, with 50k miles on them.
Thanks for the plug! Markups.org founder here, recent YC member and startup noob. I created this crowd sourced site with my sister and we are actually thinking about applying to YC.
I think you should apply to YC! you're clearly striking a nerve, so you're making something people want, which is already better than the median application.
A few months ago, I was looking to buy a new ford vehicle. Not saying the name - I am still too annoyed to advertise for them.
A lot of people wanted this, so dealers in my local area were marking up and adding dealer fees WAAAAAAAY in excess of MSRP. We aren't talking 2-3k we are talking 10-20k. When I pushed back, the dealer was happy for me to walk as there was a line of people wanting it after me.
My wife and I have only owned ford vehicles. Bought my first Toyota. I won't be back.
Ironic as during normal times Toyota dealers are among the worst for dealer markups. Look at markup history for Tacomas and 4Runners.
During the supply chain issues they've been the worst in SoCal. We wanted to buy a Sienna earlier this year and they wanted $15k over sticker and a non-refundable deposit with a 90+ day wait.
This is a dealer problem, and Ford is the only traditional auto manufacturer pushing back.
We just bought a Honda because we could get it at MSRP.
The Toyota waiting list had like 20 people on it, cost $1500 to get on, we'd have to buy fabric protection and ceramic coating for the dealer when we got the car...and we probably wouldn't even have gotten the car until early next year (this was in June)
Toyota can get away with it because they're the Kitchenaid or Levis Jeans of cars. They spent time building up a very reputable brand image and now premium consumers have it in their mind that they're "good" and any action they take can then be justified post-hoc.
I think this story is telling of the damage Ford is trying to mitigate. The choice of dealerships to take advantage of demand to raise prices for short term gain is causing long term damage to brand loyalty and awareness.
I had a similar experience when Ford chose to discontinue all their sedans. I personally like an intermediate sedan for my daily driver - it's small enough to be fuel efficient and easy to drive, but large enough to hold 5 people and go touring in (not to mention fit me, a larger individual). When Ford stopped selling a sedan, I no longer became a customer interested in their products, even after having two previous Ford vehicles that I've been quite happy to own.
The difference between my experience and the experience above here, however, is that the car manufacturer receives the brunt of the hate, but holds very little responsibility for the actions that hate. Dealerships have been the villain in the car buying story ever since I could remember. They were the casino, and the house always wins. When you've played the villain for so long, I believe it's only natural for you to decide to become the best villain you can be.
I think dealers need to be careful since companies like Tesla demonstrate that you might be able to cut them out completely.
Personally I buy used cars because I drive once a week and if you have friends with car repair skills maintenance is pretty cheap. That will soon change though and may never come back as cars will be locked down more (without actually having gained any significant functions as self driving is out of reach).
Efficiency got better though. A new car today might indeed use 30% less gasoline compared to a 15 year old car. Don't know how diesel compares but that seems to be the best argument for a new car.
There are legal issues with cutting dealers out, it's protectionism all the way down.
Tesla gets away with it (sort of) by having zero dealers anywhere. Even so, they can't currently sell cars within Texas, despite having moved their HQ here. Texas is not alone[0]. Most states require automakers to use dealerships!
Tesla operates stores within Texas, but only to show off the cars. If you express interest, they direct you to the website, as they are not allowed to sell to you in person.
Dealers feel pretty comfortable with their legal protections right now. They probably shouldn't, because things could change quickly, but they won't change easily.
If it gets bad enough, manufactures can spin up new brands without legacy dealership cruft. Even without that, a number of dealerships have consolidated into mega conglomerates. Manufactures could probably band together to acquire these at arms length and ensure they get the first, and largest allotment of special vehicles.
But let's not pretend manufactures are innocent in all of this. For years, they tacitly encouraged shitty behavior from dealerships. They pushed margins so low that dealerships could only survive by hitting lofty sales targets and selling overpriced addons.
The reason dealerships are okay with buying up new cars and selling them immediately as new is because this was the standard MO necessary for years to hit quarterly targets. If the dealership was two vehicles short of their target, and no customers were coming in, it looks like a few managers were buying some cars to trade back in next week. Customers don't blink at buying a "used" new car because dealerships just call them "demo" cars or something.
> Manufactures could probably band together to acquire these at arms length and ensure they get the first, and largest allotment of special vehicles.
To my rough recollection, that is also not allowed by law. The US government once acted to prevent single entities from controlling all pieces of a pipeline, a pattern or doctrine that got lost in the 1970s. Many laws from that era remain.
And yes, for sure, I'm not saying manufacturers are blameless here! If not for the laws preventing them from owning dealerships, I'm sure they would have already done so.
That may be part of a new thing. Fearful of sanctions from manufacturers, many dealerships have created shell companies, sold their supplies to the shell company for MSRP, who has immediately sold it back to the dealership for MSRP, and now sells it as a used vehicle with <100mi on it, and $20K above the new MSRP.
Works doubly well for the dealership as they continue to get new cars for behaving.
I never had a Ford, but I do like Toyotas. Sadly Toyota dealers have been marking up prices quite a bit for a while. There was a HN post recently that showed RAV 4 Primes in CA at 70k. I think this might be happening everywhere.
Hey, so I did the same. I was asked to add 9k to the 24k MSRP car. So I said no. I chose Toyota as I got the MSRP price. I would love to return to Ford but will wait until Ford sorts out the issue.
The only Ford vehicles with that sort of markup were the Mustang EV and the 150 Lightning.
The Mustang is a great car if you're looking to have fun, but it's not very practical.
The Lightning is amazing. I've gotten to ride in my neighbor's Lightning a few times, and I would buy it in a heartbeat if it weren't sold out through the end of next year.
My neighbor did not pay a dealer markup on the vehicle (in SoCal). I don't know if that's because the dealer was playing nice, or because Ford threatened to withhold Lightnings from dealers that added markups and they didn't want to lose out on future shipments.
My family was really into Chevy, but the dealership here was garbage.
My wife had a Mazda and their dealership was amazing, so we've had Mazdas ever since. There are some dealerships in town that would probably be bad, but I doubt any are as bad as that particular Chevy dealer.
Our Mazda cars have been great, too, of course, or it wouldn't matter how good the dealer was.
I'm assuming it was a Bronco or a Mach-e? Both of those seem to be in high demand right now and the prices are going nuts. I have so much respect for the dealers who are NOT selling above MSRP. They could be making a lot of extra money right now and they're choosing the right thing over more profit.
I have a relative that had the exact same problem with a Kia Telluride. They had to pay way over MSRP, plus a 'fee' for beeing on the waiting list to get one.
How is it the "right thing"? Its car $60k+, not food during a disaster. When there is a glut of cars are buyers going to say hey I will pay you MSRP and not the discount you are giving because you need to move the cars off the lot?
>>They also wouldn't have a new vehicle available for 2 months as their cars were sold that far in advance
Is that.....meant to be long? Everywhere I ask, every dealer every brand, every model, if you want a brand new vehicle from factory, the wait time is at least 6 months, usually 12+ months. If you want a brand new Kia EV6, the earliest delivery time is Q1 2024 - the order book is closed for 2023 already.
It's a tiny metro area (entire metro consists of roughly 3 million people) over approximately 6,000 square miles.
The dealerships I spoke with get small monthly deliveries, and only the unpopular trims are available at the 2 month mark.
I suspect being in an area that makes extensive use of salt on the roads in winter might not help, as new cars will depreciate that much faster- perhaps they simply aren't in as much demand as used cars. Used retail prices right now are nearly the same as MSRP if it has less than 50k miles.
Of course, if you want one of the trendy models, wait time is almost certainly much longer.
a) A combination of high MSRPs and a dearth of manufacturer rebates and sub-prime financing that ensures that the only people who come in the door are the ones who can/will pay.
b) They don't. Plenty of Toyota dealers are marking things up to the moon.
At least here the dealers appear to be "selling at sticker" but I assume that if you slip the right person enough "add-ons" you find that you're higher on the list of vehicles arriving ...
If I'm selling a product, I can either take on distribution on my own (no dealerships, self-serve) or partner with resellers (dealerships).
With the former, I control the entire sales UX and receive a higher price. If we're talking physical goods, I do have to spend more effort getting my product out there for people to inspect, try, etc. With the latter, I'm outsourcing sales to someone else. They have to procure the land, build the showroom, etc. I as the product maker just need to dump my products on them. That person receives a cut of the sale.
Assuming I have my understanding above right, I see the following factors challenging the dealership/reseller model:
* The product doesn't need to be physically inspected anymore. Much like the purchasing behavior around an iPhone, if the customer can easily grok what's going on a webpage _and_ easily return it, they are more open taking a leap of faith sight unseen or "less seen". At this point, the reseller model brings friction into the process.
* The product is so in demand that the reseller accumulates leverage and starts to upcharge which OP's video is related. The product maker has no control over these premiums. In a high volume low margin business with added pressure to eke out anything, the product maker begins to wonder.
* Due to high real estate costs, the reseller underserves certain geographies.
The car dealership landscape is legally protected. Car dealers used their local political connections to enact state-wide laws in all states preventing car manufacturers from owning or opening dealerships. That's why Tesla's showrooms are the way they are - Tesla's showrooms are carefully constructed to not get classified as Dealerships under these laws.
This is another one of Tesla’s innovations/disruptions that is clearly better and the rest of the industry is too stubborn to change even if it’s better for the consumer. No likes being hassled and pressured by a dealer.
Does any other car company let you order a car online for a flat price with minimal overhead and have it delivered right to your door?
Tesla has fought every other car company state by state with little support to be able to give the consumer a significantly better buying experience.
I’m sure if you asked the CEO of Ford today he still wouldn’t support Tesla’s business model. You can’t play both sides.
It’s not stubbornness. It’s literally illegal in 48 states to sell direct if there’s ever been a dealership for their brand in the state. As the video goes over ford os trying really hard to dump dealers, it’s not easy.
Stubbornness in supporting the direct to consumer business model. Talk is cheap, and other car companies can’t even do that, though this Ford CEO here is starting to crack.
What do you want the cord ceo to do? Selling his cars directly is illegal, it’s just not an option at this point. He instituted a rule that says that the in demand cars have to be sold to the person that ordered them but dealerships essentially told him to fuck off. Now what?
Tesla has massively raised its prices. Why does it matter if it’s a dealership raising prices or the manufacturer itself? The demand is greater than the supply and cars in the U.S. are essential for all but a few households. Prices are going to rise. It’s just a matter of who is getting the increased profit: the dealership, the manufacturer, or a third party.
15% is far greater than what other car makers have raised their prices by. There is a discrepancy between MSRP and what buyers are willing to pay. Someone will attempt to capture that profit.
Went into a dealership to look at a 30k ford bronco, dealer came back with a 60k price tag, said it was due to dealership mark ups. The worst. A dying industry taking its last breaths.
This might be rational behaviour on the part of the dealerships. They're burning their bridges to Ford and their customers, but if your business is going to die anyways you might as profit while it burns.
What's going to really kill dealerships is that EV's need so much less maintenance than ICE car's and most of that maintenance is tires and wipers which is highly competitive. Service is where dealerships make the bulk of their money.
This is for motorcycles but the jist of it is that the situation with dealerships is convenient to motorcycle manufacturers. I suspect it's semi applicable to cars as well.
If you watch the video, it is largely about manufacturer inefficiencies and abuse, and it ends essentially saying that the current system needs reform.
I'd put this into the "current model needs to change" category rather than in defense of it, regardless of what the title of the video may otherwise suggest.
In a lot of industries the dealership/distributor model smooths out cashflow and inventory. You build a bunch of something, the distributors buy it from you off the dock (or, sometimes, they even pay in advance) and then the distributor sits on the inventory while it sells. It's off of the manufacturer's books and there is cash in hand to buy more supplies.
Ford's switchover makes sense if their factories are running 100% flat-out and every car has a waiting customer. Or if it's all made-to-order and the queue is full.
What happens if demand drops off? Is Ford going to stack up cars in Dearborn or will they just randomly shut down plants to take up slack? Will you need to prepay for a car so they have the money to make it?
This is also why euro-spec Mercedes have so many more engine options compared to Americans. in the US 3 engines is a lot for a model, but some German VWs have like 7 choices. You pick the exact one for your needs.
I've heard through the grapevine that car buying services (via Costco, credit union, etc) can get you to MSRP, if not better, for some in demand models.
I had a bad experience with a similar service. It led me to a dealership which claimed to have the car I wanted at a < MSRP price. I called the dealership ahead of time and they confirmed they had that car at that price.
I got there and oops they forgot to mention that the car had a extra options package that increased the price by $$ also the car, in our opinion, had a manufacture defect which they said was normal. Finally they gave an offer on my trade-in that was about half the bluebook value.
Almost on a whim we we stopped at another dealership on our way home and got the same car, sans defect, at a lower price with a higher trade in. I think the dealerships that participate in these services rely on customer trust. The customer wants to believe they are getting the best price and the customer doesn't want to comparison shop, they just want to buy a car and go home. The participating dealership is taking advantage of that.
We stumbled upon a effective car-buying technique - come in the dealership late afternoon and tell them, truthfully, that you've got to get home before the baby-sitter leaves in about 45 minutes. We were just planning to test drive but they were motivated.
"We want car for X",
"You can have it for Y"
"We don't have time to bargain we've got to get home"
"OK, you have have it for X"
We got the car we wanted, the trade-in value we wanted, we brushed aside all discussions of extra features. Gotta go, take it or leave it.
We made it home in time and she did really have to leave. We're not good actors, I think we could only get away with it because we were 100% sincere
In the old days, when Ford manufactured cars in the USA, employees got a discount called the X-plan. If your parents, grandparents, brother, whatever, worked for Ford, you could use the X plan. You could also combine this with whatever other offers Ford was running at the time.
You'd often get $8-10,000 off a vehicle, and even more off if you bought a full-size truck.
Which countries still have dealerships of the US kind for new cars? I.e the type that keep a stock of new cars with fixed options, or that are allowed to set prices on new cars that don’t match the ones you get quoted from the manufacturer?
In Europe the dealerships, while often operates independently or with only partial ownership from
the brand, seem to be mostly showrooms with no large lot of new cars but a small selection of cars only for show/test.
The purchase is for a custom built car received through the dealer several months later. In my experience a pleasant way of buying a new car. Usually you visit the dealer having configured a car using the manufacturers online tool which gives you the exact quote. At the dealer you might be recommended to swap some option but usually you just talk it through with the salesperson and place the order. With some luck you might be able to score a bit of a rebate or extras e.g if you use their brand financing or insurance, but for the most part they just help you order the car you configure online for the price you saw online.
Where they do fleece you though is “brand service”.
So I just went to Ford.com and like almost all manufacturer’s sites, I can’t build & price without entering a zip code and immediately after doing so base prices jump for fees including delivery without any options selected. No pricing for me to go to the car is available and prices seem to increase no matter what zip code I enter. The base price seems off no matter how you want to buy. So then if I inquire about a vehicle on lot at local dealers prices are all over the place.
But if I look at a 1 year old used vehicle, prices seem to normalize and become much more consistent. Using Carvana & CarMax, the price of a Bronco Sport seems to be free and clear of arbitrary markup.
So what is the allure of new? And of buying used from a dealership? They both seem like really bad choices. But maybe there’s some real benefit to new I’m missing? I’m seriously in the market & see a video like this and feel that it reinforces my opinion that I’m better off with a used vehicle for the sake of depreciation I’m avoiding and the nightmare of doing business with price gougers.
There’s a lot of justifiable hate against dealerships but I think the hate against them for markups is not justified. Clearly there are people willing to pay above MSRP. If the dealerships don’t markup the vehicles then scalpers will buy at MSRP and resell the vehicles at a markup. As bad as the dealership experience is there is less chance for fraud or theft at a dealership than from a scalper.
In a lot of places there are two scenarios in the local car market. One dealership will sell at MSRP but you’ll have to wait 4 to 6 months. Another has inventory but at a significant markup. You can buy now and pay more or wait a while and pay less. Choose the option that fits your situation. Of course, the best option would be to properly fund public transportation.
Car scalping is a thing and it would be a much bigger thing without dealership markups. The markups at the dealership means a smaller market for scalpers. In the absence of dealership markups there would be more scalpers.
That is precisely the point I was making. The dealership becomes the scalper. Would you rather pay the scalp price at a dealership with the accompanying regulations and laws surrounding that transaction or pay the scalp price from someone you don’t know with much fewer regulations accompanying that transaction? The scalp market exists. I think it’s better to have that market at a dealership than from people you might not be able to track down in the case something goes wrong.
Tesla has significantly increased prices and such an increase lowers the ability of scalpers. I don’t know about Tesla’s policies on warranty transferability and I don’t know if that plays into things. Unlike other cars Tesla can remotely disable a car so maybe the secondary market for Teslas is different. I don’t know.
There are definitely scalpers for other brands. People are special ordering Mavericks from Ford and get them after 6 months or so and then reselling.
Increasing prices has nothing to do with scalping.
Just like Microsoft and Sony should of done with game consoles, but never did - Tesla has centralized buying which allows it to easily prevent scalping.
I don’t think you understand the market forces at play if you really believe this. If product A sells at MSRP direct from the company that produces it for $x and people are willing to pay $y for it where y is sufficiently bigger than x then there will be a reseller market for the product. If y is close enough to x then there won’t be much of a reseller market. Of course if the company has the ability to otherwise diminish the value of the product post sale then that too can distort the reseller market should the company use its power to do so.
Increasing prices has much to do with whether or not there is a reseller market. You are very much wrong.
You should about market dynamics and pricing power and whatnot. When there is an imbalance between MSRP and what buyers are willing to pay there, provided the latter quantity is sufficiently bigger than the former, then an opportunity arises. Someone along the chain will seek out the potential profit. Tesla has massively raised prices. So what if their public statement is that it is because of inflation? The publicly stated reason matters not. What matters is that they raised their prices in accordance to market forces.
There is a large reseller market for PlayStation 5 because the price Sony sells at is much less than what the market is willing to pay. So scalpers step in seeking the potential profit. There are a number of reasons Sony doesn’t raise MSRP. The main one being goodwill and future buyers. If they raise their prices to $1,0000 the psychological effect will be long term detrimental. So they don’t raise prices. But there is a market for scalpers because of this.
I’ve posted links demonstrating there is a scalper market for some new cars. Indeed, dealerships are often times, in effect, becoming scalpers by raising prices. If all dealerships sold at MSRP this would not benefit consumers in the least. Scalpers would just take over and buying a car from a scalper is a lot worse than buying it, at a premium, from a dealer.
Call it price gouging, scalping, theft or what have you. The words used don’t matter. All that matters is that there is enough potential profit to be had at the imbalance between MSRP and what buyers are willing to pay for cars that someone will be attempting to take that profit. It’s either going to be the manufacturer (Tesla), the dealer, or a third party.
Show me a report, anything that says people are buying lots of Teslas to resell them for a profit.
Oh wait you can’t. What’s your argument, raising prices was a preemptive strike against scalping? That makes sense. Really your point was disproven like 5 posts ago. Inflation across the supply chain is obviously the reason for price increases.
Sorry it’s not all a conspiracy with Tesla lying about their motives. Maybe that’s easier to believe than accepting that you could be wrong.
Microsoft and Sony both sell direct and both implement anti scalping technology into their direct sales. (only allowing one purchase per registered account, IP detecting technology to make sure same user isnt buying over and over, et cetra). Sony got me a PS5 launch day direct ship to home at no additional cost within 12 hours after purchase (I was pretty impressed that Sony was able to pull that off)
They just dont want to burn their bridges with traditional retailers quite yet Im guessing.
> If the dealerships don’t markup the vehicles then scalpers will buy at MSRP and resell the vehicles at a markup. As bad as the dealership experience is there is less chance for fraud or theft at a dealership than from a scalper.
Dealerships are absolutely doing this themselves - create a shell company, sell to their own shell company for MSRP, sell back to the dealership at MSRP, now you get to report a compliant sale to the manufacturer, and you have a "used" vehicle on your lot with <100mi that no-one can tell you not to sell for $20K above MSRP.
The fraud/theft I was talking about is seller striping the vehicle of parts and putting in used third party parts and reselling the original parts. Things like that aren’t done at the local Ford dealership. Well, there’s less chance of that. My point is that dealerships are effectively the scaler and it’s better to pay the scalp price at the Ford dealership than from some random person. At least in general.
just as the used car market is imploding he times this response to look like he's doing stuff. the bubble of everything is bursting and we are gonna hear more leaders waving their hand like they are in control (they are not).
I wonder how the absence of dealerships affects the right to repair? This becomes especially important with EVs as companies say they are too complex to be serviced by an individual or even in some cases by a anyone that's not an authorized party/dealership.
Because if you raise the price of your pickup $20,000 and Toyota doesn't then you're discouraging customers who see two similar vehicles with a significant difference in advertised price.
And if you try to work with the other companies to move prices up together, that's illegal. Same for airline tickets.
And then have to deal with all the "price gouging" press/lawsuites/legislation. The manufacturers know they need to keep selling at a constant price, otherwise it will be much much worse for their business and brand.
Ford's CEO trying to address this dealership franchise problem is going to bode well for the Ford brand overall. They are best to keep their prices down for now and make the dealers look like the bad guys everyone knows they are.
Look at the sentiment on these types of articles. Do you think Toyota wants that sentiment directed towards themselves? Supply issues might last for a couple years; brand image lasts for decades.
Does the US have nothing like CarWow? Their thing is (as far as I understand it) to pit dealers against each other to get a fair price and basically abstract them away as much as possible.
This might be a non-sequitur, but does anyone know why so many car dealerships are named after individuals? I assume it's a marketing gimmick and the answer might be as simple as that.
The Focus ST and RS should have been sales monsters but ADM from dealerships ruined those products. Really quite sad - America hasn't had a good, popular UDM hot hatch in a long time.
So free market is working as there is less supply than demand and people are complaining about it for some reason? So there was no issues when you could get car below MSRP?
People commenting on this don’t seem to understand market dynamics. The price people are willing to pay for some vehicles is much greater than the MSRP. Someone along the chain is going to sell those vehicles at the greater price. It’s either the manufacturer in the case of Tesla (they’ve massively raised their prices), or the dealership, or third party scalpers.
Ford can start selling their cars online if they think they can do better. Problem solved.
Of course the reason why they don't already do this is because they have done the math and concluded that dealerships actually earn them money.
Dealerships aren't quaking in their boots.
Is he insinuating that dealers are all illegally conspiring by the way? There must be at least a dozen Ford dealers in a 100 kilometre radius of your house they aren't rare. Find the cheapest one.
Most U.S. states have laws that only allow car sales to happen though dealers. Online car sales, even from manufacturers, just let you shop the inventory of dealerships. The purchase still goes through a dealership.
Dealer franchise agreements with the manufacturer also frequently include provisions that prevent the manufacturers from selling direct to consumer IIRC.
For most households buying a vehicle is their second largest purchase. It is meant to be enjoyable/fun. But dealerships have managed to make it very unfun/stressful/bad.
And there's always "but what if you find the unicorn dealership?!" but frankly those are few and far between. If you talk to random people in the street 9/10 will have a negative dealership story.
Dealerships do nothing to control price increases, and suggesting they do misunderstands the market forces. What controls prices is competition (i.e. other vehicles, from other manufacturers). All dealerships do is rent-seek in the middle.
I'd like to know that if my next door neighbor and I buy the same vehicle, that we paid the same price, and had the same experience. Just open up "show rooms" that don't sell vehicles, then a website where you can order for home delivery for a fixed price.
The whole "local jobs" argument would have more merit if dealerships weren't a toxic influence on local politics, and nobody is suggesting that manufacturers won't need to continue to offer local repair facilities for recalls and of course to staff these showrooms.