Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In the story, the very idea of permanently meat-based beings appals them, and in fact one of them doesn't entirely believe it. So why would they look like meat to "blend in", a priori, if one of them doesn't even fathom the idea? "Blend in" with what? One of them doesn't believe what it's dealing with!

Like a sibling comment mentions, they talk about "meat sounds"... using meat sounds! Why would they find it surprising if that's how they are communicating in the short film? They are not depicted as communicating via telepathy or whatever.

(Yes, I understand the limitations of low budget shorts. But it doesn't mean it has to work...)

 help



> So why would they look like meat to "blend in", a priori, if one of them doesn't even fathom the idea?

I'd imagine British spies in WWII sometimes wore swastikas to blend in?

They infiltrating to investigate. It needn't be an endorsement of the practice.


> I'd imagine British spies in WWII sometimes wore swastikas to blend in?

British spies in WWII wouldn't do that if the entire concept of what a swastika was baffled them. You have to understand at least basically what the thing you're looking at is in order to use it as a symbol.

If you have _no_ concept of people being made out of meat being possible, you don't dress up as people made out of meat. You do that if it's a common concept to you and you're trying to fit in.


But they mention species with a meat phase.

The concept of meat isn’t foreign. Meat that’s sentient and has no cybernetic parts or phase is.

And they do say they’ve studied and probed for several human lifetimes.


> And they do say they’ve studied and probed for several human lifetimes.

Only one of them has. The other is entirely surprised by the whole concept, and wouldn't even entertain disguising itself as something it has never considered and in fact it's being convinced during the story it even exists.

It's important for the story to work that one of the beings is entirely unconvinced and has to be told, as they discuss the matter, that this is an actual thing!


The one that looks super goofy?

He’s dressed like someone told “hey you have to try to blend in” and didn’t really know how.


Picking the right name is also important to blending in. For example: Ford Prefect.

Tom Noonan in the short film, yes.

> He’s dressed like someone told “hey you have to try to blend in” and didn’t really know how.

Blend with what? It (the alien) didn't believe these "meat" sentient beings existed when the story starts! It had to be told during the conversation. It thought there must have been machines somewhere who were the real sentient beings. How can anyone attempt to blend in with something one doesn't believe exists?

I understand the adaptation changes this, because there's no other way of working with human actors and also staying within budget. I understand the decision; I'm just saying it misses the mark and makes the story way less funny.

The way I envision this story is a couple of aliens, much like the scenes with the Simpsons aliens, hovering in a spaceship near Earth, discussing humans, with only one of them having actually seen a human. It doesn't work if both have seen them.

All in my opinion, of course, taste and sense of humor are completely subjective.


It's partly for dramatic purposes, to slow the realisation of the audience that they are aliens talking about people.

And, ofc, in-drama logic; the beings (of silicon or whatever) are/were blending in with humans to study them.


You have a point. Maybe if I hadn't read the story first it would work better for me.

In the story, there's little doubt these are aliens (though their physical form, if they have any, is never described). If there's any doubt, it's about what they are talking about -- but this is dispelled pretty soon too.

I think the real reason is simply budget.

I can understand the limitations of working around budget, and constraints sometimes spark some inventive storytelling, like in the pretty cool "The Booth at the End", which has a very similar minimalistic setting in a diner! In fact, this short somewhat reminded me of that much better show.

(If you haven't watched "The Booth at the End", I strongly encourage you to do so... it used to be free online ages ago, not sure now).


Well, if you think you can do a better job, make it happen. Make the film you want to see.

Why? Surely one can criticize a movie, book, videogame, etc, without being required to create a better one in turn.

I didn't hate it, and I always appreciate the charm of low budget productions. I'm just saying this particular adaptation doesn't work for me, and trying to explain why.

One low budget feature-length film about aliens I quite liked (though it obviously has a higher budget, and of course its own set of flaws; and to be clear I'm not arguing both productions are in the same ballpark!) is "The Vast of Night" [1]. I quite liked the actors and the directorial choices.

---

[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6803046/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: