Well that was an option. An other one would have been to point out that svn does... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		masklinn on May 29, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Git 2.0 Well that was an option. An other one would have been to point out that svn does support lock-modify-unlock so that was no issue.

robryk on May 29, 2014 [–]

I don't think that the manager's actual reason for support for lock-modify-write. I think he was just opposed to changing anything in the realm of source control and this was just a convenient rationalization.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact